Capri Holdings Limited
Case Overview
32 Days Left to Seek Lead Plaintiff
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: | Lead Plaintiff Deadline: 02/21/2025 |
Status: | Status: Investigating |
Company Name: | Company Name: Capri Holdings Limited |
Court: | Court: District of Delaware |
Case Number: | Case Number: 1:24cv01410 |
Class Period: | Class Period: 08/10/2023 - 10/24/2024 |
Ticker: | Ticker: CPRI |
Related Attorneys: | Lead Attorneys: Thomas W. Elrod |
Related Practices: | Related Practices: Securities |
The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware on behalf of those who acquired Capri Holdings Limited (“Capri” or the “Company”) (NYSE:CPRI) securities during the period of August 10, 2023, to October 24, 2024, inclusive (“the Class Period”). Investors have until February 21, 2025, to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.
On August 10, 2023, Capri and Tapestry, another fashion firm, jointly announced their entry into a merger agreement (the “Capri Acquisition”), pursuant to which Tapestry would purchase Capri for $57 per share in cash. The Capri Acquisition would combine three close competitors: Tapestry’s Coach and Kate Spade brands and Capri’s Michael Kors brand.
On November 6, 2023, Capri and Tapestry disclosed that they each received a request for additional information from the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) in connection with its antitrust review of the Capri Acquisition. On this news, the price of Capri stock declined by $1.84 per share, from $50.66 per share on November 6, 2023, to $48.82 per share on November 7, 2023.
Then, in mid-April 2024, FTC Bureau of Competition Director Henry Liu made comments about the agency’s focus at the 2024 American Bar Association Antitrust Spring meeting in Washington, D.C. Multiple new outlets reported that investors were concerned that Liu may have been referencing the Capri Acquisition as a potential enforcement target through his comments. On this news, the price of Capri stock declined by $4.72 per share, from $44.03 per share on April 9, 2024, to close at $39.31 on April 12, 2024.
Later, on April 17, 2024, The New York Times reported that the FTC was preparing to sue to block the Capri Acquisition, according to “two people with knowledge of the matter who were not authorized to discuss the deliberations.”. On this news, the price of Capri stock declined by $1.06 per share, from $38.93 per share on April 16, 2024, to close at $37.87 on April 17, 2024.
Then, on April 22, 2024, the FTC filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to enjoin the Capri Acquisition. The complaint alleged that, if allowed, the Capri Acquisition would eliminate head-to-head competition between Kate Spade, Coach, and Michael Kors, which it claimed all compete within the “accessible luxury handbag market.” On this news, the price of Capri stock declined by $3.51 per share, from $37.96 per share on April 22, 2024, to close at $34.81 on April 25, 2024.
Finally, on October 24, 2024, Judge Jennifer L. Rochon of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s motion to preliminary enjoin the Capri acquisition. In doing so, the court determined, among other things, that a “substantial body of compelling evidence” demonstrated that, in contrast to their public statements, defendants themselves believed that their brands were direct competitors in a well-defined “accessible luxury handbag market.” On this news, the price of Capri stock declined by $20.34 per share, from $41.60 per share on October 24, 2024, to close at $21.26 per share on October 25, 2024.
The complaint alleges that defendants, throughout the Class Period, made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the accessible luxury handbag market is a distinct and well-defined market within the overall handbag market and understood as such by the individual defendants, as well as by other Capri and Tapestry executives; (ii) Capri and Tapestry maintained analogous production facilities and supply chains for their accessible luxury handbags that were distinct from the production facilities and supply chains used to manufacture luxury or mass market handbags, confirming that the accessible luxury handbag market is distinct from the mass market and luxury handbag markets; (iii) Capri and Tapestry internally considered Coach and Michael Kors to be each other's closest and most direct competitors; (iv) that, conversely, Capri and Tapestry did not internally consider their handbag brands to be in direct competition with luxury handbags or mass market handbags; (v) a primary internal rationale for the Capri acquisition was to consolidate prevalent brands within the accessible luxury handbag market so as to reduce competition, increase prices, improve profit margins, and reduce consumer choice within that market; and (vi) as a result of the above, the risk of adverse regulatory actions and/or the Capri acquisition being blocked was materially higher than represented by defendants.
On August 10, 2023, Capri and Tapestry, another fashion firm, jointly announced their entry into a merger agreement (the “Capri Acquisition”), pursuant to which Tapestry would purchase Capri for $57 per share in cash. The Capri Acquisition would combine three close competitors: Tapestry’s Coach and Kate Spade brands and Capri’s Michael Kors brand.
On November 6, 2023, Capri and Tapestry disclosed that they each received a request for additional information from the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) in connection with its antitrust review of the Capri Acquisition. On this news, the price of Capri stock declined by $1.84 per share, from $50.66 per share on November 6, 2023, to $48.82 per share on November 7, 2023.
Then, in mid-April 2024, FTC Bureau of Competition Director Henry Liu made comments about the agency’s focus at the 2024 American Bar Association Antitrust Spring meeting in Washington, D.C. Multiple new outlets reported that investors were concerned that Liu may have been referencing the Capri Acquisition as a potential enforcement target through his comments. On this news, the price of Capri stock declined by $4.72 per share, from $44.03 per share on April 9, 2024, to close at $39.31 on April 12, 2024.
Later, on April 17, 2024, The New York Times reported that the FTC was preparing to sue to block the Capri Acquisition, according to “two people with knowledge of the matter who were not authorized to discuss the deliberations.”. On this news, the price of Capri stock declined by $1.06 per share, from $38.93 per share on April 16, 2024, to close at $37.87 on April 17, 2024.
Then, on April 22, 2024, the FTC filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to enjoin the Capri Acquisition. The complaint alleged that, if allowed, the Capri Acquisition would eliminate head-to-head competition between Kate Spade, Coach, and Michael Kors, which it claimed all compete within the “accessible luxury handbag market.” On this news, the price of Capri stock declined by $3.51 per share, from $37.96 per share on April 22, 2024, to close at $34.81 on April 25, 2024.
Finally, on October 24, 2024, Judge Jennifer L. Rochon of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s motion to preliminary enjoin the Capri acquisition. In doing so, the court determined, among other things, that a “substantial body of compelling evidence” demonstrated that, in contrast to their public statements, defendants themselves believed that their brands were direct competitors in a well-defined “accessible luxury handbag market.” On this news, the price of Capri stock declined by $20.34 per share, from $41.60 per share on October 24, 2024, to close at $21.26 per share on October 25, 2024.
The complaint alleges that defendants, throughout the Class Period, made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the accessible luxury handbag market is a distinct and well-defined market within the overall handbag market and understood as such by the individual defendants, as well as by other Capri and Tapestry executives; (ii) Capri and Tapestry maintained analogous production facilities and supply chains for their accessible luxury handbags that were distinct from the production facilities and supply chains used to manufacture luxury or mass market handbags, confirming that the accessible luxury handbag market is distinct from the mass market and luxury handbag markets; (iii) Capri and Tapestry internally considered Coach and Michael Kors to be each other's closest and most direct competitors; (iv) that, conversely, Capri and Tapestry did not internally consider their handbag brands to be in direct competition with luxury handbags or mass market handbags; (v) a primary internal rationale for the Capri acquisition was to consolidate prevalent brands within the accessible luxury handbag market so as to reduce competition, increase prices, improve profit margins, and reduce consumer choice within that market; and (vi) as a result of the above, the risk of adverse regulatory actions and/or the Capri acquisition being blocked was materially higher than represented by defendants.