Edison International
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2262a/2262a3463ffe648c3492fc2239255e86bf529d1c" alt=""
Case Overview
59 Days Left to Seek Lead Plaintiff
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: | Lead Plaintiff Deadline: 04/21/2025 |
Status: | Status: Investigating |
Company Name: | Company Name: Edison International |
Court: | Court: Central District of California |
Case Number: | Case Number: 2:25cv01383 |
Class Period: | Class Period: 02/25/2021 - 02/06/2025 |
Ticker: | Ticker: EIX |
Related Attorneys: | Lead Attorneys: Thomas W. Elrod |
Related Practices: | Related Practices: Securities |
The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of those who acquired Edison International (“Edison” or the “Company”) (NYSE:EIX) securities during the period from February 25, 2021, through February 6, 2025 (“the Class Period”). Investors have until April 21, 2025, to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.
Edison International is a parent holding company of Southern California Edison Company (“SCE”) and Edison Energy Group, Inc. (“Edison Energy Group”). Throughout the class period, Edison claimed that SCE uses its Public Safety Power Shutoffs (“PSPS”) program to “proactively de-energize power liens to mitigate the risk of catastrophic wildfires during extreme weather events.”
On January 7, 2025, a fire began in the area of Eaton Canyon (the “Easton Canyon Fire”) in the unincorporated census designated place in Los Angeles County, California, called Altadena. Following the outbreak of the Easton Canyon Fire, on January 8, 2025, Edison stated in a press release that its “distribution lines immediately to the west of Easton Canyon were de-energized well before the reported start time of the fire, as part of SCE’s PSPS program. However, on January 12, 2025, Edison admitted that there were “no interruptions or operational/electrical anomalies in the 12 hours prior to the fire’s reported start time until more than one hour after the reported start time of the fire.”
On January 13, 2025, a complaint was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles alleging that the fires originated from Edison’s power lines. The complaint included eye-witness accounts and photographs that showed the fire was started by Edison’s electrical equipment. On this news, the price of Edison shares declined by $7.73 per share, or approximately 11%, from $65.00 per share on January 10, 2025, to close at $57.27 on January 13, 2025.
Then, on February 6, 2025, The Wall Street Journal reported that SCE “submitted two letters to the California Public Utilities Commission with updates on its analysis of the Eaton and Hurst wildfires, saying it believes its equipment may be associated with the start of the Hurst fire.” On this news, the price of Edison shares declined by $1.06 per share, from $51.15 per share on February 6, 2025, to close at $50.09 on February 7, 2025.
The complaint alleges that defendants, throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Edison’s claim that SCE used its PSPS program to “proactively de-energize power lines to mitigate the risk of catastrophic wildfires during extreme weather events,” was false; and (2) this resulted in heightened fire risk in California and heightened legal exposure to the Company.
Edison International is a parent holding company of Southern California Edison Company (“SCE”) and Edison Energy Group, Inc. (“Edison Energy Group”). Throughout the class period, Edison claimed that SCE uses its Public Safety Power Shutoffs (“PSPS”) program to “proactively de-energize power liens to mitigate the risk of catastrophic wildfires during extreme weather events.”
On January 7, 2025, a fire began in the area of Eaton Canyon (the “Easton Canyon Fire”) in the unincorporated census designated place in Los Angeles County, California, called Altadena. Following the outbreak of the Easton Canyon Fire, on January 8, 2025, Edison stated in a press release that its “distribution lines immediately to the west of Easton Canyon were de-energized well before the reported start time of the fire, as part of SCE’s PSPS program. However, on January 12, 2025, Edison admitted that there were “no interruptions or operational/electrical anomalies in the 12 hours prior to the fire’s reported start time until more than one hour after the reported start time of the fire.”
On January 13, 2025, a complaint was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles alleging that the fires originated from Edison’s power lines. The complaint included eye-witness accounts and photographs that showed the fire was started by Edison’s electrical equipment. On this news, the price of Edison shares declined by $7.73 per share, or approximately 11%, from $65.00 per share on January 10, 2025, to close at $57.27 on January 13, 2025.
Then, on February 6, 2025, The Wall Street Journal reported that SCE “submitted two letters to the California Public Utilities Commission with updates on its analysis of the Eaton and Hurst wildfires, saying it believes its equipment may be associated with the start of the Hurst fire.” On this news, the price of Edison shares declined by $1.06 per share, from $51.15 per share on February 6, 2025, to close at $50.09 on February 7, 2025.
The complaint alleges that defendants, throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Edison’s claim that SCE used its PSPS program to “proactively de-energize power lines to mitigate the risk of catastrophic wildfires during extreme weather events,” was false; and (2) this resulted in heightened fire risk in California and heightened legal exposure to the Company.