FMC Corporation
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb240/eb2401099e7949c163635cd469400d955272e839" alt=""
Case Overview
52 Days Left to Seek Lead Plaintiff
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: | Lead Plaintiff Deadline: 04/14/2025 |
Status: | Status: Investigating |
Company Name: | Company Name: FMC Corporation |
Court: | Court: Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Case Number: | Case Number: 2:25cv00771 |
Class Period: | Class Period: 11/16/2023 - 02/04/2025 |
Ticker: | Ticker: FMC |
Related Attorneys: | Lead Attorneys: Thomas W. Elrod |
Related Practices: | Related Practices: Securities |
The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of those who acquired FMC Corporation (“FMC” or the “Company”) (NYSE:FMC) securities during the period from November 16, 2023, through February 4, 2025 (“the Class Period”). Investors have until April 14, 2025, to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.
On February 4, 2025, after the market closed, FMC released its fourth quarter 2024 financial results, revealing that it had missed its previously announced full fiscal year revenue guidance as well as consensus estimates. The Company explained “growth was below [the Company’s] expectations as [it] learned during the quarter that customers in many countries sought to hold significantly less inventory than they have historically.” The Company also provided a Full Year 2025 outlook, disclosing that it expects revenue to remain essentially flat due to “weaker demand in the channel as customers in many countries prioritize holding lower than historical levels of inventory.” In an earnings call held the same day, FMC’s CEO, Pierre Brondeau, revealed FMC “need[s] to significantly lower FMC inventory in the channel much beyond what we were expecting.” Brondeau explained that the Company had faced pricing competition which it was “unwilling to meet” or adjust to, which led the Company to “walk away” from “sales opportunities.” This strategy had backfired as the Company as met with “lower-than-expected demand across most regions as customers lowered the amount of inventory they are willing to hold” to a historical low. As a result, the Company had “high levels of FMC product in the channel” including “elevated channel inventories in some countries in LATAM, including Brazil, Asia, including India, as well as Canada and Eastern Europe.” On this news, the price of FMC shares declined by $18.12 per share, or approximately 33%, from $54.04 per share on February 4, 2025, to close at $35.92 on February 5, 2025.
The complaint alleges that defendants, throughout the Class Period, failed to disclose to investors: (1) the Company’s channel management initiatives were not progressing as represented; (2) that, faced with pricing pressure, the Company had made the decision not to compete on prices and instead walk away from sales opportunities; and (3) that, as a result, the Company had inflated inventory in the channels in "LATAM, including Brazil, Asia, including India, as well as Canada and Eastern Europe.”
On February 4, 2025, after the market closed, FMC released its fourth quarter 2024 financial results, revealing that it had missed its previously announced full fiscal year revenue guidance as well as consensus estimates. The Company explained “growth was below [the Company’s] expectations as [it] learned during the quarter that customers in many countries sought to hold significantly less inventory than they have historically.” The Company also provided a Full Year 2025 outlook, disclosing that it expects revenue to remain essentially flat due to “weaker demand in the channel as customers in many countries prioritize holding lower than historical levels of inventory.” In an earnings call held the same day, FMC’s CEO, Pierre Brondeau, revealed FMC “need[s] to significantly lower FMC inventory in the channel much beyond what we were expecting.” Brondeau explained that the Company had faced pricing competition which it was “unwilling to meet” or adjust to, which led the Company to “walk away” from “sales opportunities.” This strategy had backfired as the Company as met with “lower-than-expected demand across most regions as customers lowered the amount of inventory they are willing to hold” to a historical low. As a result, the Company had “high levels of FMC product in the channel” including “elevated channel inventories in some countries in LATAM, including Brazil, Asia, including India, as well as Canada and Eastern Europe.” On this news, the price of FMC shares declined by $18.12 per share, or approximately 33%, from $54.04 per share on February 4, 2025, to close at $35.92 on February 5, 2025.
The complaint alleges that defendants, throughout the Class Period, failed to disclose to investors: (1) the Company’s channel management initiatives were not progressing as represented; (2) that, faced with pricing pressure, the Company had made the decision not to compete on prices and instead walk away from sales opportunities; and (3) that, as a result, the Company had inflated inventory in the channels in "LATAM, including Brazil, Asia, including India, as well as Canada and Eastern Europe.”