Match Group, Inc.
Case Overview
35 Days Left to Seek Lead Plaintiff
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: | Lead Plaintiff Deadline: 01/24/2025 |
Status: | Status: Investigating |
Company Name: | Company Name: Match Group, Inc. |
Court: | Court: Central District of California |
Case Number: | Case Number: 2:24cv10153 |
Class Period: | Class Period: 05/02/2023 - 11/06/2024 |
Ticker: | Ticker: MTCH |
Related Attorneys: | Lead Attorneys: Thomas W. Elrod |
Related Practices: | Related Practices: Securities |
The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of those who acquired Match Group, Inc. (“Match Group” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ:MTCH) securities during the period of May 2, 2023, to November 6, 2024, inclusive (“the Class Period”). Investors have until January 24, 2025, to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.
On November 6, 2024, Match Group published its Q3 2024 shareholder letter. The shareholder letter disclosed that Tinder’s monthly active user numbers were down 9% year-over-year in Q3, which was the same rate of decline it saw in Q2, falling short of expectations for continued improvement in year-over-year trends.
On November 7, 2024, Investopedia published an article entitled “Match Group Stock Slips as Fourth Quarter Outlook Disappoints.”. The article stated the following: “Revenue and downloads of Hinge continued to grow, but Match said Tinder Direct revenue came in below its own expectations, as the app’s monthly active users declined 9% from the same time last year and its revenue per payer grew less than expected. Some new features tested with Tinder users in the quarter negatively impacted subscription revenue, which the company said will likely also have an impact on fourth quarter revenue.” On this news, the price of Match shares fell by $6.77 per share, or approximately 17.8%, from $$37.88 per share on November 6, 2024, to close $31.11 on November 7, 2024.
The Complaint alleges that defendants, throughout the Class Period, made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: 1) Match Group materially understated the challenges affecting Tinder and, as a result, understated the risk that Tinder's monthly active user count would not recover by the time that Match Group reported its financial results for the third quarter of 2024; and (2) as a result, defendants’ statements about Match Group’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all times.
On November 6, 2024, Match Group published its Q3 2024 shareholder letter. The shareholder letter disclosed that Tinder’s monthly active user numbers were down 9% year-over-year in Q3, which was the same rate of decline it saw in Q2, falling short of expectations for continued improvement in year-over-year trends.
On November 7, 2024, Investopedia published an article entitled “Match Group Stock Slips as Fourth Quarter Outlook Disappoints.”. The article stated the following: “Revenue and downloads of Hinge continued to grow, but Match said Tinder Direct revenue came in below its own expectations, as the app’s monthly active users declined 9% from the same time last year and its revenue per payer grew less than expected. Some new features tested with Tinder users in the quarter negatively impacted subscription revenue, which the company said will likely also have an impact on fourth quarter revenue.” On this news, the price of Match shares fell by $6.77 per share, or approximately 17.8%, from $$37.88 per share on November 6, 2024, to close $31.11 on November 7, 2024.
The Complaint alleges that defendants, throughout the Class Period, made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: 1) Match Group materially understated the challenges affecting Tinder and, as a result, understated the risk that Tinder's monthly active user count would not recover by the time that Match Group reported its financial results for the third quarter of 2024; and (2) as a result, defendants’ statements about Match Group’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all times.