Sunlight Financial Holdings, Inc. f/k/a Spartan Acquisition Corp. II et al.
Case Overview
26 Days Left to Seek Lead Plaintiff
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: | Lead Plaintiff Deadline: 12/02/2024 |
Status: | Status: Investigating |
Company Name: | Company Name: Sunlight Financial Holdings, Inc. f/k/a Spartan Acquisition Corp. II et al. |
Court: | Court: District of New Jersey |
Case Number: | Case Number: 2:24cv09510 |
Class Period: | Class Period: 01/25/2021 - 10/31/2023 |
Ticker: | Ticker: SUNLQ |
Related Attorneys: | Lead Attorneys: Thomas W. Elrod |
Related Practices: | Related Practices: Securities |
The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas on behalf of those who acquired Sunlight Financial Holdings, Inc., formerly known as Spartan Acquisition Corp. II (“Sunlight” or the “Company”) (Other: SUNLQ) securities during the period of January 25, 2021 through October 31, 2023, inclusive (“the Class Period”). Investors have until December 2, 2024 to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.
The lawsuit claims that Cross River Bank ("CRB"), a banking partner of Sunlight, engaged in a scheme to issue loans to disreputable solar contractors with questionable creditworthiness. This allowed Sunlight to build up a large pool of fixed-rate loans on CRB's balance sheet, though Sunlight bore the risk of loss. These loans carried significant default and interest rate risks for Sunlight, but Sunlight lacked the capital to withstand defaults or rising interest rates. Neither Sunlight nor CRB disclosed the full extent of these risks to the Plaintiff and the Class. When interest rates rose, Sunlight's increasing off-balance sheet liabilities—held on CRB’s books—were also concealed. CRB’s ongoing extensions of credit and assistance in hiding Sunlight’s actual debt from investors, along with Sunlight’s misrepresentations about its loan exposure, concealed Sunlight’s financial troubles, keeping the company’s share price artificially inflated during the Class Period.
The lawsuit claims that Cross River Bank ("CRB"), a banking partner of Sunlight, engaged in a scheme to issue loans to disreputable solar contractors with questionable creditworthiness. This allowed Sunlight to build up a large pool of fixed-rate loans on CRB's balance sheet, though Sunlight bore the risk of loss. These loans carried significant default and interest rate risks for Sunlight, but Sunlight lacked the capital to withstand defaults or rising interest rates. Neither Sunlight nor CRB disclosed the full extent of these risks to the Plaintiff and the Class. When interest rates rose, Sunlight's increasing off-balance sheet liabilities—held on CRB’s books—were also concealed. CRB’s ongoing extensions of credit and assistance in hiding Sunlight’s actual debt from investors, along with Sunlight’s misrepresentations about its loan exposure, concealed Sunlight’s financial troubles, keeping the company’s share price artificially inflated during the Class Period.